You have misunderstood. The guys have a new platform, and the idea was to show how to create a common system on futures.io (formerly BMT) could be easily created on the platform. Unfortunately it didn't look too easy, and came off as very complex instead. cjbooth is not an Elite Member, there should be no chance he is using any elite indicators.

But they are not selling the system, it was just a demo. As for naming the indicators, they are listed in a public (non-Elite) forum, it is no secret.

They are not going to profit from it. I think you have completely taken this out of context. They are a platform. Like NinjaTrader, MultiCharts. They have no interest in marketing a trading method.

Mike

Hmm, it seems my normal introduction was not recorded properly for whatever reason in today's webinar. I'm assuming everyone live could hear me do the introduction before turning it over to Alan, but the recording only starts with Alan. ?

Mike

Dear all,

Thanks for the comments. I am sorry that I am not doing a good job in that webinar by going into the detail of a complex trading system. In addition, I caught cold the night before and thus my throat was very uncomfortable in the middle of the webinar.

My initial objective is just to prove that we can build a very complex system in our platform. We have live trading systems using in-house which are using two bar types and three timeframes. It is not possible to model such system using other trading platforms and that's the strength of our platform.

Anyway, thanks for your time and patience.

Alan

Tend to agree with Forrestang about the goal (demonstrating the features and how actually the platform works).
However, a more effective presentation, IMHO, would have been much more effective if structured more or less like this

1. Introduction of the platform (was done but in quite a scattered way)
2. Logic and philosophy underlining the project of NPT and its features (as above)
3. Case study based on a simpler (not a banal one, but a simpler one) trading plan
4. Future plans about new features, releases, and so on (maybe it has been done, but I left before the end due to my poor understanding of the presentation itself)
5. Pricing :-)

The case study should have been structured in turn with a crisp and precise presentation of it (rules and logic behind) then a step by step implementation, from scratch to the final product. Eventually, having implemented from the basic case study, it could have been possible to further implement it, adding rules, orders, indicators, to demonstrate the flexibility of NPT.

Finally, as an european potential user I would ask whether any integration with european data provider is foreseen, along with any further details about costs or at least pricing approach of NPT

Thanks for the feedback. We will imporve our webinar and presentation in the future. We are now working on additional data providers and brokers. Do you have a preferred European Data provider.

Thanks,
Alan