NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





What is the Real Risk of Trading


Discussion in Psychology and Money Management

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one algorithmic with 7 posts (6 thanks)
    2. looks_two grausch with 4 posts (7 thanks)
    3. looks_3 deaddog with 4 posts (11 thanks)
    4. looks_4 rahulgopi with 3 posts (6 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one deaddog with 2.8 thanks per post
    2. looks_two rahulgopi with 2 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 grausch with 1.8 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 algorithmic with 0.9 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 5,512 views
    2. thumb_up 40 thanks given
    3. group 9 followers
    1. forum 23 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

What is the Real Risk of Trading

  #11 (permalink)
 
deaddog's Avatar
 deaddog 
Prince George BC Canada
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: National Bank Direct
Broker: NBD/BMO/Questrade
Trading: Stocks
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 1,306 since May 2013
Thanks Given: 184
Thanks Received: 4,063


algorithmic View Post
as long as your equity is reducing , your risk will be INCREASED.if you 've a modest trading account of 10k and each time you risk only 100$,whenever your equity is 8k,then 100$ is not 1% of your equity .
as you pointed, draw downs have additional pressure on mind , so they are additional hidden risk too

When you equity is 8K you should only risk $80

"The days when I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations, I have really good days" RW Hubbard
Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
How to apply profiles
Traders Hideout
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
Pivot Indicator like the old SwingTemp by Big Mike
NinjaTrader
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
 
  #12 (permalink)
 grausch 
Luxembourg, Luxembourg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TWS
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Stocks
Posts: 494 since May 2012
Thanks Given: 1,731
Thanks Received: 1,159

With fixed fractional position sizing and a fixed percentage stop in theory your account can never blow up - based on the above, risking 1% on a $10 account would imply risk of only $0.10 of the account. Subsequent losses would keep on decreasing the account, but since the $risk keeps on decreasing it can never reach zero.

However, that does not take into account slippage and commissions, but you should get the idea. Using fixed fractional position sizing with fixed percentage stops really gives you a cushion when you are not trading well. Only downside, coming out of a drawdown takes longer as trades taken are of a smaller size. That is a downside I can live with quite comfortably.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #13 (permalink)
 
rahulgopi's Avatar
 rahulgopi 
milpitas, ca, usa
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, Ameritrade
Trading: ES, Gold, 10 Yr
Posts: 1,723 since Feb 2014
Thanks Given: 1,389
Thanks Received: 4,206



algorithmic View Post
real risk of trading is beyond profit or loss . you loose your time ,your best times that can be spend wit family ,friends, etc.. you glaze your eyes over charts and you will have a virtual life. you lose at least 5 years of your age in order to find a trading system. ( i can not believe anyone can find a system less than 4-5 years of trying hard)
but speaking in terms of real risk ,there is no guarantee about the risk , even if you risk 1% of your equity ,there would be the possibility of 100 times of loss in a row.every thing is possible , so modeling risk in mathematical manner is just making yourself fool. Nichols Nasim Taleb (PHD in statistics)says : even in the best financial engineering departments in universities,there would be nothing more than wrong ideas and pseudo science .
some years ago two Nobel Prize winners of Economy science ,started a investment fund in USA. they implemented all modern theories and mathematical aspects of controlling risk .but their fund fell in the market .as a human we can not measure "real risk" of anything.trading is not an exception

I remember watching Chris Rock in a standup where he talks about job and career. career is something you aspire to do , you have the passion for it and it is part of who you are. job is something you do to earn a living, just to survive. When we model our behavior, I usually look at the great ones who are able to strike a balance in all aspects of life and succeed tremendously. Honestly day trading is better than anything out there in the world for self improvement, if one is up for it.

My intention for this post was to look at the optimal mindset for trading, how you look at risk and loss from a probability point of view using a system with positive expectancy. IS there a probability for anything else to happen ? absolutely yes. One can always plan to contain the risk regarding other aspects of trade and life like getting a life insurance, umbrella insurance, choosing the right broker, setting daily loss limit for your account etc. But for the purpose of the act of trading itself, one has to learn to think in probabilities and look at risk and loss accordingly.

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #14 (permalink)
 
SodyTexas's Avatar
 SodyTexas 
Austin TX
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Ninjatrader, Python, & R
Broker: RJO
Trading: Futures, Spreads
Posts: 421 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 117
Thanks Received: 1,085


rahulgopi View Post
I realized that a lot of our conversation around Risk and Loss is not conducive for an optimal mindset for trading. As a matter of fact, the concept of risk and loss as we see in other life situations doesn't apply for trading. Understanding this will help us see the real opportunity in "Risk and Loss" while trading.

Trading is based on probability. Any given trade has a probability to Win BIG or Loose Small. Loosing small is a mandatory requirement for Winning Big and letting the probability to work in the long run.

As you can see any system with a positive expectancy will produce a profit in the long run Provided we take small looses on the way. It is how probability works.

In conclusion, If you are using a system with positive expectancy and have the discipline to follow it, there is no Risk in trading, there is only Opportunity to either Win Big or Loose small in any trade for the greater good of turning a profit in the long run.

Someone has been reading Van Tharp or Ralph Vince.. Expectancy is one thing, but also don't forget the Risk of Ruin and the statistical t-score!!

Cheers,

Sody

"The great Traders have always been humbled by the market early on in their careers creating a deep respect for the market. Until one has this respect indelibly engraved in their makeup, the concept of money management and discipline will never be treated seriously."
Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #15 (permalink)
algorithmic
 
Posts: 29 since Feb 2015
Thanks Given: 13
Thanks Received: 19


deaddog View Post
When you equity is 8K you should only risk $80

after a while risking less than a specific amount is impossible.for example each candle in CL in 5 minute time frame has 15 ticks on average.so with 80 $ ,it's impossible to trade.the only way is to increase risk

Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)
algorithmic
 
Posts: 29 since Feb 2015
Thanks Given: 13
Thanks Received: 19


grausch View Post
With fixed fractional position sizing and a fixed percentage stop in theory your account can never blow up - based on the above, risking 1% on a $10 account would imply risk of only $0.10 of the account. Subsequent losses would keep on decreasing the account, but since the $risk keeps on decreasing it can never reach zero.

However, that does not take into account slippage and commissions, but you should get the idea. Using fixed fractional position sizing with fixed percentage stops really gives you a cushion when you are not trading well. Only downside, coming out of a drawdown takes longer as trades taken are of a smaller size. That is a downside I can live with quite comfortably.

you're rigth, but i wonder if these can still be applied to a modest trading account which can trade maximum 1 lots.
i think u meant risking 1% on a 10k $ account would imply risk of only ??? of the account ?

Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,463 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,236
Thanks Received: 101,658


algorithmic View Post
after a while risking less than a specific amount is impossible.for example each candle in CL in 5 minute time frame has 15 ticks on average.so with 80 $ ,it's impossible to trade.the only way is to increase risk

Untrue.

Simply stop trading such a highly leveraged product like CL. You could trade the ETF equity instead USO. You could trade the micro QM. Another option would be to stop trading altogether until your account is properly funded.

Mike

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #18 (permalink)
algorithmic
 
Posts: 29 since Feb 2015
Thanks Given: 13
Thanks Received: 19


SodyTexas View Post
Someone has been reading Van Tharp or Ralph Vince.. Expectancy is one thing, but also don't forget the Risk of Ruin and the statistical t-score!!

Cheers,

Sody

Van Tharp underestimated a lot of factors.he underestimated how difficult/time consuming it is to find a trading strategy and also REAL risk

Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)
algorithmic
 
Posts: 29 since Feb 2015
Thanks Given: 13
Thanks Received: 19


Big Mike View Post
Untrue.

Simply stop trading such a highly leveraged product like CL. You could trade the ETF equity instead USO. You could trade the micro QM. Another option would be to stop trading altogether until your account is properly funded.

Mike

Mike,your words are correct and also my words are correct too.
reality can have different aspects/sides.i just said a scenario about trading a specific instrument and possibility of risk on that specific instrument.of course i know that a wise action would be stop trading but i supposed we want to trade an specific strategy with constant strategy .i think in that way our risk will be increased in drawdown period and will decrease in profit periods

Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)
 
tturner86's Avatar
 tturner86 
Portland, Oregon
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: F-16CM-40
Trading: GBU-39
Posts: 6,191 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 10,459
Thanks Received: 12,695


Risk is the lifeblood of trading. In our bodies our blood carries oxygen and life to our organs. In trading Risk carries Reward to our accounts. Keeping the anatomy analogy Leverage would then be our blood pressure as it amplifies the Risk and Reward. As with our blood, oxygenation levels, and blood pressure there are levels that are considered healthy for our bodies. In trading the same applies. There are correct levels for Risk, Reward, and Leverage. A lot of people focus on r:r ratios and neglect leverage.

One of the biggest things as a trader that we must keep in mind is money management. And by that I mean real money management or position sizing. Position sizing determines how efficiently we are trading our risk capital. If we are inefficient in our position sizing, risk, and leverage then we increase the risk of ruin exponentially.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on March 1, 2015


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts