NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





setting targets


Discussion in Psychology and Money Management

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one PandaWarrior with 3 posts (7 thanks)
    2. looks_two Big Mike with 2 posts (6 thanks)
    3. looks_3 liquidcci with 2 posts (6 thanks)
    4. looks_4 trendisyourfriend with 1 posts (3 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 3 thanks per post
    2. looks_two liquidcci with 3 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 trendisyourfriend with 3 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 PandaWarrior with 2.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 2,998 views
    2. thumb_up 29 thanks given
    3. group 9 followers
    1. forum 14 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

setting targets

  #1 (permalink)
 mcteague 
New York NY USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: esignal, thinkorswim,
Trading: Stocks
Posts: 122 since Oct 2012
Thanks Given: 63
Thanks Received: 35

When I see a trade fall out of profitability and become unprofitable because it failed to reach the target and then fell back to a loss I start to question some common trading assumptions. Those are that targets should be based on support and resistance levels, or Fibonacci extensions, or some other method that seeks to maximize the profit of a particular trade. I question the correctness of that thinking when I step back and look at the bigger picture. I think the common way of thinking about targets promotes lottery, or grand slam thinking. The number of losing trades is so high that one looks to hit one out of the park just to stay even.

Any system, or signal, or method you use to select a trade will have a certain success rate. It follows logically that a ten point move is less likely than a five point move, and that a five point move is less likely than a 2 point move, and so on. That is our percentage of successful trades must increase as our target becomes smaller. So, assuming our stock picking system is not complete crap, isn't it best to enter trades looking for very small targets. Wouldn't you have a very high success rate.

I think most people have higher targets because their success rate is so low, but they are wrong. There success rate is so low because their targets are so high. Many years ago a very well known finance guy said “Professionals win small. Amateurs lose big”. I think about that a lot.

People I know who are traders don't agree with me. I do not understand what is wrong in my thinking.
I just think looking for ¼ point moves rather than larger ones would produce astounding success rates.
But I must be wrong because no one seems to do this.

Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Are there any eval firms that allow you to sink to your …
Traders Hideout
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
Deepmoney LLM
Elite Quantitative GenAI/LLM
The space time continuum and the dynamics of a financial …
Emini and Emicro Index
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
61 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
39 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
26 thanks
Battlestations: Show us your trading desks!
24 thanks
The Program
18 thanks
  #3 (permalink)
 
DarkPoolTrading's Avatar
 DarkPoolTrading   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 1,036 since May 2012
Thanks Given: 1,244
Thanks Received: 1,326


It is generally agreed that the best discretionary traders in the world have a roughly 50-60% win rate, as quoted by several prop firm owners (obviously not talking about trend following, which is even lower). So you need to use this to keep things in perspective. The best of the best,...the traders who trade multi-million dollar accounts, are wrong almost half the time.

What makes them successful is being able to push winners.

Aiming for a high win percentage is not only incredibly psychologically difficult, but also not achievable in almost all cases.

The thinking you're talking about is why so many new traders are attracted to scalping. They think they'll just get in for a couple ticks and then get out. The problem is that slippage, commissions and losses make tiny profits disappear in the blink of an eye.

Diversification is the only free lunch
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,396 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,172
Thanks Received: 101,535


mcteague View Post
I think most people have higher targets because their success rate is so low, but they are wrong. There success rate is so low because their targets are so high. Many years ago a very well known finance guy said “Professionals win small. Amateurs lose big”. I think about that a lot.

I don't agree with this, at least not on futures.io (formerly BMT). From what I've seen, most people on futures.io (formerly BMT) are scalpers, and have very tiny targets and stops. The reason they don't succeed is probably because they are more or less operating on a 50% win rate (flip a coin) but after factoring in commissions and slippage, they are net negative on their account.

Add to that the occasional moving of stops and taking a big loss and they are wiped out.

Personally, I trade with big targets. I take few trades. I trade multiple products on a longer time frame. Commission and slippage is irrelevant for me. But I am somewhat alone in this on futures.io (formerly BMT).

Mike

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 liquidcci 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Trading: NQ, CL
Posts: 866 since Jun 2011
Thanks Given: 610
Thanks Received: 1,091


Big Mike View Post
I don't agree with this, at least not on futures.io (formerly BMT). From what I've seen, most people on futures.io (formerly BMT) are scalpers, and have very tiny targets and stops. The reason they don't succeed is probably because they are more or less operating on a 50% win rate (flip a coin) but after factoring in commissions and slippage, they are net negative on their account.

Add to that the occasional moving of stops and taking a big loss and they are wiped out.

Personally, I trade with big targets. I take few trades. I trade multiple products on a longer time frame. Commission and slippage is irrelevant for me. But I am somewhat alone in this on futures.io (formerly BMT).

Mike


I use fairly large targets on most markets and they work quite well.

"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #6 (permalink)
 
PandaWarrior's Avatar
 PandaWarrior 
In the heat
 
Experience: None
Posts: 3,165 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 6,329
Thanks Received: 13,404

I'm in the middle of this....I like larger targets but understand my larger targets are someone else's scalp targets. I think trading for 1-5 ticks on pretty much any instrument is going to eventually end in disaster.....unless you are extremely disciplined and some are...but for the vast majority, I think targets need to be large enough to make trans action costs irrelevant....after all, people use to pay big bucks to make a trade and there were profitable traders then....

I am not an intra day swing trader.....meaning I don't hold all day looking to be ultimately right about the days direction. Instead I look to capture some portion of intra day legs and let it go at that....I am right about 60% of the time and generally speaking, my R:R is around 1.5:1 or larger.....so net profitable and if I size right, its even better.

I think straight scalping is ultimately unsustainable for all but the most disciplined traders.....

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication, Leonardo da Vinci


Most people chose unhappiness over uncertainty, Tim Ferris
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,396 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,172
Thanks Received: 101,535

I would define scalping by taking the average daily range and comparing your individual trade targets to it. If your target is 10-15% of the ADR, I would definitely call you a scalper. If it's 50% of the ADR then I would call you a day trader. 200% ADR and I would call you a swing trader. etc

Mike

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #8 (permalink)
 nightshade 
canton mi
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: ninja xtrader
Trading: tf, es
Posts: 230 since Jan 2014
Thanks Given: 328
Thanks Received: 146


mcteague View Post

I think most people have higher targets because their success rate is so low, but they are wrong. There success rate is so low because their targets are so high. Many years ago a very well known finance guy said “Professionals win small. Amateurs lose big”. I think about that a lot.

People I know who are traders don't agree with me. I do not understand what is wrong in my thinking.
I just think looking for ¼ point moves rather than larger ones would produce astounding success rates.
But I must be wrong because no one seems to do this.

i think one should use targets based on frame and the frames harmonics/ rotations for example the /tf can easily move 10 ticks intraday each move but 2-3 points is a little more difficult

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #9 (permalink)
 
PandaWarrior's Avatar
 PandaWarrior 
In the heat
 
Experience: None
Posts: 3,165 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 6,329
Thanks Received: 13,404


Big Mike View Post
I would define scalping by taking the average daily range and comparing your individual trade targets to it. If your target is 10-15% of the ADR, I would definitely call you a scalper. If it's 50% of the ADR then I would call you a day trader. 200% ADR and I would call you a swing trader. etc

Mike

By that definition, I fall somewhere between scalping and day trader definitions and that depends on the day of course. I'm ok with that definition for now. It makes sense to me.

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication, Leonardo da Vinci


Most people chose unhappiness over uncertainty, Tim Ferris
Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #10 (permalink)
 jodistrict 
san diego
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: FXCM MarketScope, NT, Interactive brokers, AMP
Broker: FXCM, Interactive Brokers
Trading: FOREX, IWM, SPY, XLE, NQ
Posts: 228 since Apr 2010
Thanks Given: 72
Thanks Received: 145


I don't use targets. They are just too speculative. I try to do it from the bottom up, i.e using different trailing stop strategies with the Ninja ATM. During the day, there can be several runners where you can get 20 ticks in a few minutes with the price never falling below the ma 7. I also will sometimes trail up placing stops below the moving average 7 or 13.

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on July 21, 2014


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts